From the TIKC Advisory Team · Compliance & Regulatory Alerts
The Million-Dollar Fraud Statute: What Major Fraud Against the United States Means for You
Most contractors have heard of the False Claims Act. Fewer know about Major Fraud Against the United States, a criminal law aimed squarely at fraud…

Published 2026 | TIKC NewsWire
Most contractors have heard of the False Claims Act, which is a civil law that costs money. Fewer know about a criminal cousin called Major Fraud Against the United States. It sits in the law books at 18 U.S.C. 1031, and it is aimed straight at fraud on bigger government contracts, generally those worth $1 million or more. The word that matters here is criminal. This is not just paying money back. This is fines that can run into the millions and, for the people involved, the possibility of prison. If your business is growing into larger awards, this is a line you need to understand.
What this law actually covers
Major Fraud targets a scheme to defraud the United States, or to get money or property by false pretenses, in connection with a government contract or related program of a certain size. In plain words, if you set up a plan to cheat the government on a large contract, whether by lying about what you delivered, inflating what you charged, or faking what you did, this is the law that can turn a billing dispute into a criminal case. It was written to go after serious, deliberate fraud on the contracts that cost taxpayers the most.
Why the dollar size changes everything
As your contracts get bigger, the government’s attention gets sharper. A small invoice error is one thing. A pattern of false billing on a multimillion-dollar award is the kind of case prosecutors build a criminal file around. The same false paperwork that creates civil liability can also be a false statement and feed a Major Fraud charge. Growth is good, but it raises the stakes on every certification you sign, which is why your billing has to get more disciplined, not less, as you scale.
The people behind the company are exposed
Criminal fraud laws do not just punish the business. They reach the people who ran the scheme. An owner or manager who directed false billing on a large contract can face charges personally, which is the hard edge of individual accountability in government work. This is why you never let pressure to hit a number push you into shading what you bill. On a large contract especially, how you handle your progress payments and interim invoices is exactly where this risk lives.
What to do now
- Respect the size line. Treat contracts of $1 million or more as higher-risk and build tighter billing controls around them.
- Bill only what is real. Every invoice should match delivered work and documented cost.
- Separate duties. Do not let one person create, approve, and submit claims without a second set of eyes.
- Kill the pressure to pad. Make clear to your team that no revenue target justifies a false bill.
- Get help early. If you spot a serious billing problem on a big award, talk to counsel before it grows.
Winning larger contracts is the goal, and you should chase it. Just carry the discipline up with you. Bill honestly, watch your big awards closely, and the growth that builds your business never turns into the kind of case that ends it. Brick by brick.
FAQ
What is Major Fraud Against the United States?
It is a criminal law at 18 U.S.C. 1031 targeting schemes to defraud the government on contracts and programs, generally those worth $1 million or more. It carries heavy fines and possible prison time.
How is it different from the False Claims Act?
The False Claims Act is civil and costs money. Major Fraud is criminal and can mean prison for the people involved, not just payment.
Why does the contract size matter?
The law is aimed at larger contracts, and the government gives bigger awards more scrutiny. The same false paperwork carries much higher stakes at scale.
How do I protect my company?
Build strong billing controls on large awards, bill only for real delivered work, separate who creates and approves claims, and remove any pressure to inflate numbers.
Sources
18 U.S.C. 1031. Major fraud against the United States. (2026).
U.S. Department of Justice. (2026). Justice Manual, guidance on procurement fraud prosecutions.
This article is general information, not legal advice.
About the Author
Melanie Patterson
Founder and CEO of Team Integrity Knowledge Center and creator of GovCon iSource. Former nurse turned entrepreneur with over 10 years guiding small, women-owned, and minority-owned businesses to over $10 million in government awards. Build, grow, scale, brick by brick. Contact
Your next step
Talk it through with a TIKC advisor
Continue reading
Related stories

Do Your Share of the Work: The Limitations on Subcontracting Rule
When you win a small-business set-aside, the government expects your small business to actually do the work, not hand most of it to a big…

The Wage Rules for Service Work: The Service Contract Act Explained
If you hold a federal service contract, with janitors, guards, call-center staff, or maintenance crews, the Service Contract Act sets what you must pay them…

Paying the Prevailing Wage: The Davis-Bacon and Certified Payroll Trap
On federal construction, you do not get to decide what to pay your workers. The Davis-Bacon Act sets a prevailing wage, and every week you…

When the Auditor Walks the Floor: Surviving a DCAA Floor Check
One day, with no warning, a government auditor shows up and asks your people what they are working on and what contract they are charging…

Timecard Fraud Just Drove a $184 Million Settlement. Your Hours Are the New Target
In 2026, the fastest road to a giant False Claims Act bill is not a fake product or a phantom vendor. It is the timesheet…

The $400 Hammer Problem: Spare-Parts and Catalog Overpricing
The government buys a lot of spare parts, and overcharging for them is one of the oldest and most watched forms of contract abuse. Marking…

Loading the Front End: Why Unbalanced Bidding Can Backfire
You can win a job and still get your pricing wrong in a way that raises red flags. Front-loading early line items, or shifting price…

Pass the First One for Real: First Article Testing and the Approval Trap
On many contracts, before you can ship in volume, one sample has to pass first article testing. Certifying that the first article passed, or sending…

Follow Your Own Rules: Cost Accounting Compliance and Why Consistency Is the Law
Once you tell the government how you account for costs, you have to actually do it that way, every time, on every contract. Quietly shifting…

Warn Before the Money Runs Out: The Limitation of Cost and Funds Clauses
On a cost-type contract, you do not just keep working and billing when the budget is running low. You have a duty to warn the…

Asking for More, Honestly: Why a Padded Request for Equitable Adjustment Is Fraud
When the government changes the job, you have a right to ask for more money through a request for equitable adjustment. That is fair and…

In 2026, GovCon Enforcement Got Personal
Across 2026, one pattern keeps showing up in government contracting settlements: the government is naming the people, not just the companies. CEOs and presidents are…




