From the TIKC Advisory Team · Compliance & Regulatory Alerts
Warn Before the Money Runs Out: The Limitation of Cost and Funds Clauses
On a cost-type contract, you do not just keep working and billing when the budget is running low. You have a duty to warn the…

Published 2026 | TIKC NewsWire
If you hold a cost-reimbursement contract, there is a clause that quietly carries real teeth, and a lot of owners miss it. It is the Limitation of Cost clause, and its cousin the Limitation of Funds clause. In plain terms, they say you cannot just keep spending and billing past the money in the contract and expect to be paid. You have an affirmative duty to warn the government in advance when you are getting close to running out. Miss that notice and two bad things can happen: you may end up working for free, or you may look like you hid the overrun until it was too late.
What the clauses require
On a cost-type contract, the government commits a certain amount, and these clauses govern what happens as you approach it. They require you to notify the contracting officer, usually in writing and by a set point, such as when you expect that your costs will reach a defined percentage of the estimated total within the next stretch of work. The point is to give the government time to decide whether to add money, change the scope, or stop the work. The government is not obligated to pay you above the limit, so the notice protects both sides.
Why silence is so costly
Owners get into trouble by staying quiet and pushing forward, hoping the government will cover it later. But if you blow past the limit without the required notice, you are generally not entitled to be reimbursed for the overrun. You can literally perform work you never get paid for. Worse, quietly continuing to bill while you know the money is about to run out can look like you concealed the problem, which drags an honest budgeting miss toward the territory of a false statement about the state of your billing.
This is really a cost-tracking problem
The notice is only as good as your ability to see the overrun coming, which is why this is at heart a cost-system discipline. If your cost tracking is accurate and current, you will see that you are heading toward the limit in time to send the warning. If your books lag, you find out you are over only after you already are, when it is too late to give proper notice. Watching your burn rate against the funded amount is not just good management. On a cost contract, it is a compliance obligation.
What to do now
- Know your clause. Find the Limitation of Cost or Funds clause in each cost-type contract and its notice trigger.
- Track burn against funding. Watch your incurred cost against the funded and estimated amounts continuously.
- Send notice early. Warn the contracting officer in writing before you hit the threshold, not after.
- Do not work past the limit on hope. Get more funding or direction before spending above the committed amount.
- Keep the notice on record. Document that you warned on time, so a budget issue never looks like concealment.
Running low on a cost contract is not a scandal. It happens on real projects. What matters is that you see it coming and say so in time. Keep your cost tracking current, send the warning early, and a tight budget stays a conversation with your contracting officer instead of unpaid work or a cloud over your honesty. Brick by brick.
FAQ
What do the Limitation of Cost and Funds clauses require?
On cost-type contracts, they require you to notify the contracting officer in advance as your costs approach the funded or estimated amount, so the government can decide whether to add money or change the work.
What happens if I do not give notice?
You generally cannot be reimbursed for costs above the limit, so you may perform work you are never paid for, and silence can look like concealment.
Why is this a cost-system issue?
You can only warn in time if your cost tracking is current. Lagging books mean you discover the overrun only after it happens, too late for proper notice.
How do I stay compliant?
Know the clause and its trigger, track burn against funding continuously, send written notice early, do not work past the limit on hope, and keep the notice on record.
Sources
Federal Acquisition Regulation. (2026). FAR 52.232-20, Limitation of Cost, and 52.232-22, Limitation of Funds.
Defense Contract Audit Agency. (2026). Contract Audit Manual, cost monitoring on cost-reimbursement contracts.
This article is general information, not legal advice.
About the Author
TIKC Staff Writer
Team Integrity Knowledge Center is a GovCon education and consulting platform helping small, women-owned, and minority-owned businesses win and keep federal and state contracts with plain-English guidance. Build, grow, scale, brick by brick. Contact
Your next step
Talk it through with a TIKC advisor
Continue reading
Related stories

Do Your Share of the Work: The Limitations on Subcontracting Rule
When you win a small-business set-aside, the government expects your small business to actually do the work, not hand most of it to a big…

The Wage Rules for Service Work: The Service Contract Act Explained
If you hold a federal service contract, with janitors, guards, call-center staff, or maintenance crews, the Service Contract Act sets what you must pay them…

Paying the Prevailing Wage: The Davis-Bacon and Certified Payroll Trap
On federal construction, you do not get to decide what to pay your workers. The Davis-Bacon Act sets a prevailing wage, and every week you…

When the Auditor Walks the Floor: Surviving a DCAA Floor Check
One day, with no warning, a government auditor shows up and asks your people what they are working on and what contract they are charging…

Timecard Fraud Just Drove a $184 Million Settlement. Your Hours Are the New Target
In 2026, the fastest road to a giant False Claims Act bill is not a fake product or a phantom vendor. It is the timesheet…

The $400 Hammer Problem: Spare-Parts and Catalog Overpricing
The government buys a lot of spare parts, and overcharging for them is one of the oldest and most watched forms of contract abuse. Marking…

Loading the Front End: Why Unbalanced Bidding Can Backfire
You can win a job and still get your pricing wrong in a way that raises red flags. Front-loading early line items, or shifting price…

Pass the First One for Real: First Article Testing and the Approval Trap
On many contracts, before you can ship in volume, one sample has to pass first article testing. Certifying that the first article passed, or sending…

Follow Your Own Rules: Cost Accounting Compliance and Why Consistency Is the Law
Once you tell the government how you account for costs, you have to actually do it that way, every time, on every contract. Quietly shifting…

Asking for More, Honestly: Why a Padded Request for Equitable Adjustment Is Fraud
When the government changes the job, you have a right to ask for more money through a request for equitable adjustment. That is fair and…

In 2026, GovCon Enforcement Got Personal
Across 2026, one pattern keeps showing up in government contracting settlements: the government is naming the people, not just the companies. CEOs and presidents are…




