From the TIKC Advisory Team · Federal Contracting News
Paid for Work Not Yet Done: Progress Payments and the Billing Lines You Cannot Cross
Progress payments and interim billing let contractors get paid before final delivery, but they rest entirely on honest reporting of costs and completion. Overstate what…

Published 2026 | TIKC NewsWire
Cash flow is the quiet killer of growing contractors, so the ability to get paid along the way, rather than only at final delivery, is a lifeline. Progress payments, performance-based payments, and interim cost vouchers all let money come in while the work is still underway. That access comes with a condition that is easy to rationalize away under financial pressure: every interim bill must honestly reflect the costs you have incurred and the work you have actually done. The moment you bill ahead of reality, a cash-flow tool turns into a fraud exposure.
How interim payments work
There are a few common mechanisms. Progress payments on fixed-price work are typically based on costs incurred as the work proceeds, paid as a percentage. Performance-based payments are tied to the achievement of defined events or milestones. On cost-reimbursement and time-and-materials work, you submit interim vouchers for costs and hours as you go. All of them share a common logic: the government advances money against a representation that the underlying costs, progress, or milestones are real.
Where interim billing goes wrong
The danger is that the representation drifts from the truth. The classic problems include front-loading, billing a disproportionate share of costs early to pull cash forward, claiming milestones that have not actually been achieved, billing costs not yet incurred, and charging costs that are unallowable or belong to a different contract. Each of these inflates an interim claim, and because the government relies on that claim to release funds, each can be a false claim. Intent matters, but reckless indifference to whether the bill is accurate is enough under the False Claims Act.
The temptation is the trap
What makes this area dangerous is that the pressure feels legitimate. A milestone is almost done, payroll is due, and billing a week early seems harmless because the work will be finished soon. But almost done is not done, and soon is not now. The government did not agree to fund your optimism. When a milestone slips or a cost does not materialize as billed, you are left holding money you represented you had earned. That gap is precisely what auditors and relators look for, and good intentions do not erase a false certification.
Keep the billing honest and provable
The defense is a billing process tied tightly to reality. Bill only costs actually incurred and milestones actually achieved, supported by records you could hand an auditor without flinching. Keep contract costs segregated so you never bill one contract for another’s costs. Screen out unallowable costs before they hit an invoice. And if you discover you were overpaid on an interim basis, treat it as an obligation to return, not a windfall to keep, which also keeps you clear of reverse-false-claims and overpayment problems.
What to do now
- Bill only what is real. Interim claims must reflect costs incurred and milestones genuinely achieved.
- Do not front-load. Pulling cash forward by overstating early costs is a classic false-claim pattern.
- Segregate contract costs. Never let one contract’s costs be billed to another.
- Screen unallowables. Keep disallowed costs out of every interim voucher.
- Return overpayments. If an interim payment outran the work, give the excess back promptly and document it.
Getting paid as you go is a privilege that rests entirely on the honesty of each bill. Invoice the truth, keep the records, and your cash flow never becomes your liability. Brick by brick.
FAQ
What are progress payments?
Interim payments on fixed-price work, typically based on costs incurred as the work proceeds and paid as a percentage, so a contractor is not waiting until final delivery to be paid.
How do performance-based payments differ?
They are tied to the achievement of defined events or milestones rather than a percentage of costs. Claiming a milestone you have not met is a false representation.
What interim-billing practices create False Claims Act risk?
Front-loading costs, claiming unachieved milestones, billing costs not yet incurred, and charging unallowable or mischarged costs. Reckless indifference to accuracy is enough for liability.
What if I was overpaid on an interim bill?
Treat it as an obligation to return promptly, not a windfall. Keeping a known overpayment can create reverse-false-claims and overpayment exposure.
Sources
Federal Acquisition Regulation. (2026). Subpart 32.5, Progress Payments, and Subpart 32.10, Performance-Based Payments.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2026). False Claims Act enforcement involving progress and interim billing.
This article is general information, not legal advice.
About the Author
Melanie Patterson
Founder and CEO of Team Integrity Knowledge Center and creator of GovCon iSource. Former nurse turned entrepreneur with over 10 years guiding small, women-owned, and minority-owned businesses to over $10 million in government awards. Build, grow, scale, brick by brick. Contact
Your next step
Talk it through with a TIKC advisor
Continue reading
Related stories

One Faked Test Cost a Navy Supplier $10.9 Million
A company that makes steel for Navy ships let a tester change results so weak steel looked like it passed. It is paying about $10.9…

When Competitors Become Co-Conspirators: Bid Rigging and Collusion
A quiet word with a competitor about who wins which job feels like cooperation. It is a federal antitrust crime. Bid rigging and collusion carry…

The Set-Aside That Was Performed by the Wrong Company. A $4.8 Million Lesson.
A federal IT contractor and its owner agreed to pay $4.8 million after allegedly paying fees to 8(a) firms to win set-aside work, then doing…

The Cover-Up That Is Worse Than the Problem: Obstruction and Altering Records
When an audit or investigation looms, the instinct to clean up a file is a catastrophic one. Deleting an email or backdating a document can…

The Official Who Approved His Own Payday. A Conflict-of-Interest Indictment.
A government contracting official was charged after allegedly approving invoices that funneled money back to a side business he profited from, aided by a contractor…

The Case You Never See Coming: The FCA Seal, First-to-File, and the Disclosure Bar
A whistleblower suit can sit under court seal for years while the government investigates you in secret. Understanding the seal, the first-to-file rule, and the…

Winning on a Promise You Cannot Keep: Fraud in the Inducement
Overstate your staff, your experience, or your capabilities to win the award, and you can poison the entire contract. Fraud in the inducement means the…

The Loyalty You Owe: Honest Services Fraud and the Hidden Conflict
You can commit a federal crime without stealing a dollar. Honest services fraud punishes the person who secretly sells out the loyalty they owe, through…

$377 Million for the Costs It Should Not Have Billed. A Mischarging Lesson.
A major contractor agreed to pay $377 million, one of the largest procurement fraud settlements ever, over how it billed indirect costs to the government…
The Chip That Was Not Real: Counterfeit Electronic Parts and Your Duty to Catch Them
A single counterfeit microchip in a defense system can cost lives and end a company. For many contractors, the law does not just punish knowingly…

Signing for Your Code: The Secure Software Development Self-Attestation
If you sell software to the government, a senior executive now has to personally attest that it was built following secure development practices. That signature…

The NDA Clause That Can Void Your Contract: The Anti-Gag Rule
That confidentiality agreement your employees sign may quietly break federal law. The anti-gag rule bars contractors from using NDAs that stop employees from reporting fraud…




