From the TIKC Advisory Team · Proposal & Procurement Insights
NDAA Raised the CAS and TINA Thresholds — These Changes Are Already in Effect and Every Defense Contractor Must Recalibrate
The FY2026 NDAA raised the CAS contract threshold from $2.5M to $35M and the certified cost/pricing data (TINA) threshold from $2.5M to $10M for defense…

Published August 28, 2026 | TIKC NewsWire
Two of the most significant compliance reforms in the FY2026 National Defense Authorization Act are already in effect — and a significant number of defense contractors have not yet recalibrated their compliance posture to reflect them. A significant increase in the threshold for requiring certified cost or pricing data took effect for certain defense contracts on July 1, 2026. Section 1804 of the FY2026 NDAA increased the threshold from $2.5 million to $10 million. And separately, Section 1806(d) of the NDAA text increases the threshold for the mandatory application of CAS at the contract level from $2.5 million to $35 million, effectively eliminating the current CAS trigger contract mechanism.
Change 1: The TINA Threshold Is Now $10 Million
The Truthful Cost or Pricing Data Act — historically known as TINA — requires contractors to submit certified cost or pricing data when negotiating defense contracts above the applicable threshold. Section 1804(c) raises this threshold to $10 million for contracts entered into after June 30, 2026. Inaccurate certified cost or pricing data may reduce contract price, trigger penalties, and even expose companies to False Claims Act liability.
Change 2: The CAS Threshold Is Now $35 Million
Cost Accounting Standards are a set of 19 standards governing how contractors accumulate and allocate costs under government contracts. Section 1806(d) raises this threshold to $35 million, effectively eliminating the current CAS trigger contract mechanism. For the vast majority of small and mid-size defense contractors, this change means they will no longer face CAS coverage on new contracts.
What This Means for Your Compliance Program
Apply the new thresholds to contracts entered after July 1, 2026 only. Both the TINA and CAS threshold increases apply prospectively. Existing contracts remain subject to the prior thresholds.
If you have previously been CAS-covered, reassess your coverage status. Your future contracting decisions may be significantly simplified — and that simplification should factor into your business development strategy.
The FCA exposure for TINA violations shifts to higher-value contracts. TINA’s certification requirement now applies to defense contracts above $10 million. The FCA consequences apply to every negotiation above that threshold with the same force they applied at $2.5 million.
Commercial item and fixed-price contractors may see the largest benefit. If you have avoided defense contracting because of CAS and TINA compliance costs, the landscape has changed materially. Reassess your entry strategy.
The Bottom Line
The FY2026 NDAA’s CAS and TINA threshold increases are the most significant defense contractor accounting compliance reforms in years, and they are already in effect. If your firm has contracts entered after July 1, 2026, review them against the new thresholds now. Brick by brick — understand your obligations under the law as it is today, not as it was last year.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is TINA and what does the threshold change mean?
TINA requires contractors to submit certified cost or pricing data when negotiating defense contracts above the applicable threshold. The FY2026 NDAA raised that threshold from $2.5 million to $10 million for defense contracts entered after June 30, 2026.
What is the new CAS threshold and who is affected?
The FY2026 NDAA raised the CAS coverage threshold from $2.5 million to $35 million. Negotiated prime contracts and subcontracts below $35 million entered after the effective date no longer trigger CAS coverage for most contractors.
Do these changes apply to existing contracts?
No — both the TINA and CAS threshold changes apply prospectively to contracts entered after the specified effective dates (July 1, 2026 for TINA). Existing contracts remain subject to the prior thresholds.
References
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani. (2026, August). August 2026 Government Contracts Legal Update and Podcast. https://www.grsm.com/insight/august-2026-government-contracts-legal-update-and-podcast/
Government Contracts Law. (2026, January). Swept Away: FY2026 NDAA Updates to CAS and Certified Cost or Pricing Data Thresholds. https://www.governmentcontractslaw.com/2026/01/swept-away-fy26-ndaa-updates-to-cas-and-certified-cost-or-pricing-data-thresholds/
About the Author
Melanie Patterson
Founder & CEO of Team Integrity Knowledge Center and creator of GovCon iSource. Former nurse turned entrepreneur with over 10 years guiding small, women-owned, and minority-owned businesses to over $10 million in government awards. Build, grow, scale — brick by brick. Contact
Your next step
Where Proposal Writing fits
Continue reading
Related stories

Do Your Share of the Work: The Limitations on Subcontracting Rule
When you win a small-business set-aside, the government expects your small business to actually do the work, not hand most of it to a big…

The Wage Rules for Service Work: The Service Contract Act Explained
If you hold a federal service contract, with janitors, guards, call-center staff, or maintenance crews, the Service Contract Act sets what you must pay them…

Paying the Prevailing Wage: The Davis-Bacon and Certified Payroll Trap
On federal construction, you do not get to decide what to pay your workers. The Davis-Bacon Act sets a prevailing wage, and every week you…

When the Auditor Walks the Floor: Surviving a DCAA Floor Check
One day, with no warning, a government auditor shows up and asks your people what they are working on and what contract they are charging…

Timecard Fraud Just Drove a $184 Million Settlement. Your Hours Are the New Target
In 2026, the fastest road to a giant False Claims Act bill is not a fake product or a phantom vendor. It is the timesheet…

The $400 Hammer Problem: Spare-Parts and Catalog Overpricing
The government buys a lot of spare parts, and overcharging for them is one of the oldest and most watched forms of contract abuse. Marking…

Loading the Front End: Why Unbalanced Bidding Can Backfire
You can win a job and still get your pricing wrong in a way that raises red flags. Front-loading early line items, or shifting price…

Pass the First One for Real: First Article Testing and the Approval Trap
On many contracts, before you can ship in volume, one sample has to pass first article testing. Certifying that the first article passed, or sending…

Follow Your Own Rules: Cost Accounting Compliance and Why Consistency Is the Law
Once you tell the government how you account for costs, you have to actually do it that way, every time, on every contract. Quietly shifting…

Warn Before the Money Runs Out: The Limitation of Cost and Funds Clauses
On a cost-type contract, you do not just keep working and billing when the budget is running low. You have a duty to warn the…

Asking for More, Honestly: Why a Padded Request for Equitable Adjustment Is Fraud
When the government changes the job, you have a right to ask for more money through a request for equitable adjustment. That is fair and…

In 2026, GovCon Enforcement Got Personal
Across 2026, one pattern keeps showing up in government contracting settlements: the government is naming the people, not just the companies. CEOs and presidents are…




