From the TIKC Advisory Team · Compliance & Regulatory Alerts
The Wage Law That Follows Every Service Contract: SCA Compliance and Its Teeth
If you hold a federal service contract, the Service Contract Act sets the minimum wages and fringe benefits you must pay. Underpay, and you face…

Published 2026 | TIKC NewsWire
If your company provides services to the federal government, from janitorial and landscaping to security, IT support, and food service, there is a wage law riding along with your contract whether you planned for it or not. It is the McNamara-O’Hara Service Contract Act, usually just called the SCA. It dictates the minimum wages and fringe benefits you must pay the people doing the work, and the enforcement behind it is serious. Underpay your workers, even by accident, and the consequences can reach your payments, your profit, and your eligibility to contract at all.
What the SCA requires
The SCA applies to most federal service contracts over $2,500. On covered contracts, you must pay service employees at least the prevailing wage and provide the fringe benefits determined by the Department of Labor for their locality and job classification. The applicable rates come in a wage determination that is incorporated into your contract. If you do not provide the required fringe benefits in kind, you generally must pay their cash equivalent. The obligation attaches to the work, so it also flows down to your subcontractors.
Where contractors go wrong
Most SCA violations are not schemes. They are mistakes, and they are expensive anyway. The classic errors include misclassifying employees into the wrong labor category to pay a lower rate, failing to pay the full fringe benefit amount, ignoring the wage determination when it is updated, and not tracking hours by the correct classification. On a recompete or an option year, a new wage determination can raise your costs, and a firm that fails to account for it can find itself both underpaying workers and underwater on the contract.
The enforcement has real teeth
The Department of Labor enforces the SCA, and its remedies bite. The government can withhold contract payments to cover back wages owed to underpaid workers. You can be ordered to pay those back wages in full. And in serious cases, a violator can be placed on a list making it ineligible for federal contracts for three years, a debarment that runs in parallel to the FAR system. On top of that, a knowingly false certification of SCA compliance can pull you into False Claims Act territory, where damages triple.
Build compliance into the bid, not the audit
The firms that stay clean treat the wage determination as a core input to pricing, not an afterthought. They classify employees accurately, track hours by classification, pay the correct fringe in cash or benefits, and re-price when a new wage determination lands. They keep the payroll records that prove it. When you build SCA compliance into how you bid and how you run the contract, you protect both your workers and your margin.
What to do now
- Read the wage determination. Know the classifications, prevailing wages, and fringe rates in your contract before you price it.
- Classify accurately. Put each employee in the correct labor category and pay accordingly.
- Pay the full fringe. Provide the required benefits or their cash equivalent, and document it.
- Re-price on updates. A new wage determination on an option or recompete can change your costs. Account for it.
- Keep payroll records. Accurate records by classification are your proof of compliance and your audit defense.
The SCA is a promise to the people who actually deliver your service. Keep that promise precisely, and you protect your workers and your company at once. Brick by brick.
FAQ
What is the Service Contract Act?
A federal law requiring contractors on covered service contracts to pay service employees at least the locally prevailing wage and fringe benefits set by the Department of Labor in a wage determination.
What contracts does it cover?
Most federal service contracts over $2,500, across fields like janitorial, security, landscaping, food service, and IT support. The obligations also flow down to subcontractors.
What happens if I underpay workers?
The government can withhold contract payments to cover back wages, order full back-wage payment, and in serious cases make the contractor ineligible for federal contracts for three years.
Can an SCA problem become a False Claims Act case?
Yes. A knowingly false certification of SCA compliance can create False Claims Act exposure, where damages are tripled.
Sources
U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division. (2026). McNamara-O’Hara Service Contract Act (SCA) compliance.
Federal Acquisition Regulation. (2026). Subpart 22.10, Service Contract Labor Standards.
This article is general information, not legal advice.
About the Author
Melanie Patterson
Founder and CEO of Team Integrity Knowledge Center and creator of GovCon iSource. Former nurse turned entrepreneur with over 10 years guiding small, women-owned, and minority-owned businesses to over $10 million in government awards. Build, grow, scale, brick by brick. Contact
Your next step
Talk it through with a TIKC advisor
Continue reading
Related stories

Do Your Share of the Work: The Limitations on Subcontracting Rule
When you win a small-business set-aside, the government expects your small business to actually do the work, not hand most of it to a big…

The Wage Rules for Service Work: The Service Contract Act Explained
If you hold a federal service contract, with janitors, guards, call-center staff, or maintenance crews, the Service Contract Act sets what you must pay them…

Paying the Prevailing Wage: The Davis-Bacon and Certified Payroll Trap
On federal construction, you do not get to decide what to pay your workers. The Davis-Bacon Act sets a prevailing wage, and every week you…

When the Auditor Walks the Floor: Surviving a DCAA Floor Check
One day, with no warning, a government auditor shows up and asks your people what they are working on and what contract they are charging…

Timecard Fraud Just Drove a $184 Million Settlement. Your Hours Are the New Target
In 2026, the fastest road to a giant False Claims Act bill is not a fake product or a phantom vendor. It is the timesheet…

The $400 Hammer Problem: Spare-Parts and Catalog Overpricing
The government buys a lot of spare parts, and overcharging for them is one of the oldest and most watched forms of contract abuse. Marking…

Loading the Front End: Why Unbalanced Bidding Can Backfire
You can win a job and still get your pricing wrong in a way that raises red flags. Front-loading early line items, or shifting price…

Pass the First One for Real: First Article Testing and the Approval Trap
On many contracts, before you can ship in volume, one sample has to pass first article testing. Certifying that the first article passed, or sending…

Follow Your Own Rules: Cost Accounting Compliance and Why Consistency Is the Law
Once you tell the government how you account for costs, you have to actually do it that way, every time, on every contract. Quietly shifting…

Warn Before the Money Runs Out: The Limitation of Cost and Funds Clauses
On a cost-type contract, you do not just keep working and billing when the budget is running low. You have a duty to warn the…

Asking for More, Honestly: Why a Padded Request for Equitable Adjustment Is Fraud
When the government changes the job, you have a right to ask for more money through a request for equitable adjustment. That is fair and…

In 2026, GovCon Enforcement Got Personal
Across 2026, one pattern keeps showing up in government contracting settlements: the government is naming the people, not just the companies. CEOs and presidents are…




