From the TIKC Advisory Team · Compliance & Regulatory Alerts
I Did Not Know Is Not a Defense: How Reckless Disregard Breaks the False Claims Act
Many owners think fraud requires a deliberate lie. The False Claims Act is broader than that. If you bill the government while ignoring an obvious…

Published 2026 | TIKC NewsWire
Most owners believe that fraud has to be a deliberate lie, that you are safe as long as you did not set out to cheat. The False Claims Act is broader than that, and the gap is where good people get caught. Under the law, you can be liable if you submit a false claim knowingly, and knowingly does not only mean you knew it was false. It also covers deliberate ignorance and reckless disregard. In plain words, if you bill the government while ignoring an obvious problem, the law can treat that the same as lying. I did not know is not the shield owners think it is.
What knowingly really means
The False Claims Act says you act knowingly if you have actual knowledge that a claim is false, if you act in deliberate ignorance of whether it is true, or if you act in reckless disregard of the truth. Deliberate ignorance is choosing not to look when you had reason to. Reckless disregard is barreling ahead without the basic checking a careful contractor would do. You do not need intent to defraud. You just need to have closed your eyes to a problem you should have seen.
Why this traps honest contractors
This is the standard that catches people who never meant harm. You sign a certification without reading it. You submit an invoice your bookkeeper prepared without checking whether the hours are real. You keep billing under a clause you never bothered to understand. Each of those can be reckless disregard, and each can turn an ordinary certification into a false claim. The law expects you to actually know what you are signing and billing, not to sign first and find out later.
Ignoring a warning is the dangerous part
The most common way owners fall into this is by ignoring a red flag. An employee raises a concern and you brush it off. An audit finds an issue and you keep billing the same way. Someone asks whether a charge is really allowed and you decide not to check. Once there is a warning in front of you, continuing without looking is exactly what reckless disregard means. That is also why so many cases start from inside, because the person who raised the flag you ignored can become a whistleblower.
What to do now
- Read before you sign. Never certify or submit a claim you have not actually reviewed and understood.
- Check your own billing. Spot-check invoices your staff prepare instead of trusting them blindly.
- Chase down red flags. When someone raises a concern, investigate it before you bill again.
- Understand your clauses. Know what each contract requires so you are not billing in the dark.
- Fix and disclose. If you find a problem, correct it and disclose rather than keep going.
You do not have to be a liar to be liable, which sounds scary, but it is really an invitation to be careful. Read what you sign, check what you bill, and never ignore a warning, and reckless disregard never becomes your problem. Careful is not just safe. It is the whole game. Brick by brick.
FAQ
Does the False Claims Act require intent to cheat?
No. You can be liable if you act with actual knowledge, deliberate ignorance, or reckless disregard of whether a claim is false. Intent to defraud is not required.
What is reckless disregard?
Submitting a claim without the basic checking a careful contractor would do, especially after a warning. It is treated much like knowing the claim was false.
What is deliberate ignorance?
Choosing not to look into whether a claim is true when you had reason to question it. The law does not let you avoid liability by not asking.
How do I protect myself?
Read and understand what you sign, spot-check your billing, investigate red flags before billing again, know your contract clauses, and fix and disclose problems you find.
Sources
31 U.S.C. 3729. False Claims Act, definition of knowingly. (2026).
U.S. Department of Justice. (2026). Civil Division guidance on False Claims Act scienter.
This article is general information, not legal advice.
About the Author
Melanie Patterson
Founder and CEO of Team Integrity Knowledge Center and creator of GovCon iSource. Former nurse turned entrepreneur with over 10 years guiding small, women-owned, and minority-owned businesses to over $10 million in government awards. Build, grow, scale, brick by brick. Contact
Your next step
Talk it through with a TIKC advisor
Continue reading
Related stories

Do Your Share of the Work: The Limitations on Subcontracting Rule
When you win a small-business set-aside, the government expects your small business to actually do the work, not hand most of it to a big…

The Wage Rules for Service Work: The Service Contract Act Explained
If you hold a federal service contract, with janitors, guards, call-center staff, or maintenance crews, the Service Contract Act sets what you must pay them…

Paying the Prevailing Wage: The Davis-Bacon and Certified Payroll Trap
On federal construction, you do not get to decide what to pay your workers. The Davis-Bacon Act sets a prevailing wage, and every week you…

When the Auditor Walks the Floor: Surviving a DCAA Floor Check
One day, with no warning, a government auditor shows up and asks your people what they are working on and what contract they are charging…

Timecard Fraud Just Drove a $184 Million Settlement. Your Hours Are the New Target
In 2026, the fastest road to a giant False Claims Act bill is not a fake product or a phantom vendor. It is the timesheet…

The $400 Hammer Problem: Spare-Parts and Catalog Overpricing
The government buys a lot of spare parts, and overcharging for them is one of the oldest and most watched forms of contract abuse. Marking…

Loading the Front End: Why Unbalanced Bidding Can Backfire
You can win a job and still get your pricing wrong in a way that raises red flags. Front-loading early line items, or shifting price…

Pass the First One for Real: First Article Testing and the Approval Trap
On many contracts, before you can ship in volume, one sample has to pass first article testing. Certifying that the first article passed, or sending…

Follow Your Own Rules: Cost Accounting Compliance and Why Consistency Is the Law
Once you tell the government how you account for costs, you have to actually do it that way, every time, on every contract. Quietly shifting…

Warn Before the Money Runs Out: The Limitation of Cost and Funds Clauses
On a cost-type contract, you do not just keep working and billing when the budget is running low. You have a duty to warn the…

Asking for More, Honestly: Why a Padded Request for Equitable Adjustment Is Fraud
When the government changes the job, you have a right to ask for more money through a request for equitable adjustment. That is fair and…

In 2026, GovCon Enforcement Got Personal
Across 2026, one pattern keeps showing up in government contracting settlements: the government is naming the people, not just the companies. CEOs and presidents are…




