From the TIKC Advisory Team · Compliance & Regulatory Alerts
The Old Problem Is Not Safe Yet: How Long the Government Can Come Back on You
Owners assume that once a contract is years behind them, any mistake buried in it is gone for good. The False Claims Act reaches back…

Published 2026 | TIKC NewsWire
There is a comforting belief that trips up a lot of owners: once a contract is a few years behind you, whatever happened on it is water under the bridge. With the False Claims Act, that is not how time works. The law gives the government a long window to come after a false claim, generally up to six years, and in some situations as long as ten. A billing problem you half-remember from years ago is not necessarily gone. It may still be well inside the window, which is exactly why your old records and old habits still matter today.
How long the window really is
In general terms, the False Claims Act allows a case to be brought within six years of the violation, and under a separate rule it can stretch to as many as ten years in certain circumstances, often tied to when the government knew or should have known the key facts. The exact math gets technical and is a question for a lawyer. The practical point for you is simple: the window is measured in years, not months, and it is long enough that conduct you have mentally filed away can still surface.
Why this changes how you keep records
If the government can look back years, then your records have to survive years, and they have to tell the truth when someone reads them long after the fact. The invoices, timesheets, and certifications you file today are the evidence that will speak for you, or against you, well into the future. This is also why a whistleblower can bring a case about something that happened long ago. The clock does not quietly erase an old problem the way owners hope it does.
An old problem you find is still worth fixing
Here is the flip side that owners miss. If the window is still open on an old issue, then finding it now and dealing with it honestly still helps you. An overpayment you discover from three years ago does not get safer by sitting on it, and failing to return it can create fresh reverse false claims exposure that resets the problem. The right move when you find something old is the same as when you find something new: investigate it, correct it, and get advice on whether to disclose.
What to do now
- Keep records for years. Retain invoices, timesheets, and certifications well beyond the end of the contract.
- Do not assume old means safe. Treat a years-old billing problem as potentially still live.
- Fix what you find. An old overpayment or error still needs to be corrected, not buried.
- Return overpayments. Sitting on money you were overpaid can create new, fresh liability.
- Get advice on timing. Ask counsel how the window applies before deciding your next step.
Time does not clean up a false claim the way it cleans up a lot of other business worries. The good news is that the same long memory rewards the contractor who keeps honest records and deals with problems head-on. Keep your paperwork true and your old issues handled, and the passing years work for you instead of against you. Brick by brick.
FAQ
How long is the False Claims Act window?
Generally up to six years from the violation, and under a separate rule as long as ten years in certain circumstances. The exact calculation is technical and depends on the facts.
Does an old contract make me safe?
Not necessarily. Because the window spans years, conduct you consider long past can still be within reach of a case.
Why keep records so long?
If the government can look back years, your invoices, timesheets, and certifications are the evidence that will speak for you later. Honest, retained records are your protection.
What if I find an old problem?
Investigate and correct it, return any overpayment promptly, and get advice on disclosure. Sitting on it can create fresh liability rather than letting it fade.
Sources
31 U.S.C. 3731. False Claims Act, statute of limitations. (2026).
U.S. Department of Justice. (2026). Civil Division guidance on False Claims Act limitations periods.
This article is general information, not legal advice.
About the Author
Melanie Patterson
Founder and CEO of Team Integrity Knowledge Center and creator of GovCon iSource. Former nurse turned entrepreneur with over 10 years guiding small, women-owned, and minority-owned businesses to over $10 million in government awards. Build, grow, scale, brick by brick. Contact
Your next step
Talk it through with a TIKC advisor
Continue reading
Related stories

Do Your Share of the Work: The Limitations on Subcontracting Rule
When you win a small-business set-aside, the government expects your small business to actually do the work, not hand most of it to a big…

The Wage Rules for Service Work: The Service Contract Act Explained
If you hold a federal service contract, with janitors, guards, call-center staff, or maintenance crews, the Service Contract Act sets what you must pay them…

Paying the Prevailing Wage: The Davis-Bacon and Certified Payroll Trap
On federal construction, you do not get to decide what to pay your workers. The Davis-Bacon Act sets a prevailing wage, and every week you…

When the Auditor Walks the Floor: Surviving a DCAA Floor Check
One day, with no warning, a government auditor shows up and asks your people what they are working on and what contract they are charging…

Timecard Fraud Just Drove a $184 Million Settlement. Your Hours Are the New Target
In 2026, the fastest road to a giant False Claims Act bill is not a fake product or a phantom vendor. It is the timesheet…

The $400 Hammer Problem: Spare-Parts and Catalog Overpricing
The government buys a lot of spare parts, and overcharging for them is one of the oldest and most watched forms of contract abuse. Marking…

Loading the Front End: Why Unbalanced Bidding Can Backfire
You can win a job and still get your pricing wrong in a way that raises red flags. Front-loading early line items, or shifting price…

Pass the First One for Real: First Article Testing and the Approval Trap
On many contracts, before you can ship in volume, one sample has to pass first article testing. Certifying that the first article passed, or sending…

Follow Your Own Rules: Cost Accounting Compliance and Why Consistency Is the Law
Once you tell the government how you account for costs, you have to actually do it that way, every time, on every contract. Quietly shifting…

Warn Before the Money Runs Out: The Limitation of Cost and Funds Clauses
On a cost-type contract, you do not just keep working and billing when the budget is running low. You have a duty to warn the…

Asking for More, Honestly: Why a Padded Request for Equitable Adjustment Is Fraud
When the government changes the job, you have a right to ask for more money through a request for equitable adjustment. That is fair and…

In 2026, GovCon Enforcement Got Personal
Across 2026, one pattern keeps showing up in government contracting settlements: the government is naming the people, not just the companies. CEOs and presidents are…




