From the TIKC Advisory Team · Compliance & Regulatory Alerts
The Program the Government Expects You to Have: Your Code of Ethics
On many contracts you are required to have a written code of business ethics and an internal control system, not as a nicety but as…

Published 2026 | TIKC NewsWire
Many contractors are surprised to learn that having an ethics program is not optional goodwill. On contracts above certain thresholds, the government requires a written code of business ethics and conduct, employee awareness and training, and, for larger awards, an internal control system and a mechanism to detect and disclose misconduct. It is a contract clause, not a suggestion. The companies that treat it as a binder on a shelf get the worst of both worlds: the obligation without the protection. The ones that build it for real gain the single best defense they have when something goes wrong.
What the rule requires
The Federal Acquisition Regulation requires contractors, above dollar and schedule thresholds, to have a written code of business ethics and conduct and to make it available to every employee involved in the work. Larger contracts add more: ongoing ethics awareness and compliance training, and an internal control system reasonably designed to prevent and detect improper conduct. That internal control system is expected to include things like oversight by senior people, periodic risk assessment, mechanisms for employees to report wrongdoing without fear, and timely discipline and correction when something is found.
Why it is really about detection
The heart of the requirement is not the document. It is whether your company can find misconduct before it metastasizes. A real internal control system surfaces the billing error, the conflict, the cut corner, while it is still small and fixable. That matters enormously because the same framework ties directly to the mandatory disclosure rule: if you find credible evidence of certain violations, you may be required to disclose it. A program that cannot detect anything cannot disclose anything, and that failure is itself a problem.
The internal hotline is the point
The most valuable piece of an ethics program is a channel that lets employees raise concerns internally, safely, and early. Get this right and your people bring problems to you first. Get it wrong, through retaliation, indifference, or a culture that punishes the messenger, and they take those same concerns to the government as a qui tam relator. Every mature compliance program understands this trade: the internal report you welcome is the external lawsuit you avoid.
It protects the people, not just the company
A genuine ethics program also matters when enforcers come looking, because the government and courts weigh whether a company had real controls or merely paper ones. A credible program can mitigate consequences, while a sham one can aggravate them, and in a world of individual accountability, leaders are judged by whether they built and honored real controls. The code you actually live by is the difference between an isolated bad act and a pattern that implicates the whole company and its officers.
What to do now
- Write a real code. Adopt a written code of business ethics and conduct, and get it into the hands of everyone on the work.
- Train and repeat. Provide ongoing ethics and compliance training, not a one-time slide deck.
- Build detection in. Create an internal control system with oversight, risk assessment, and real discipline when issues surface.
- Run a safe hotline. Give employees a protected way to report concerns internally, and never retaliate.
- Connect it to disclosure. Make sure findings route to the people who decide whether a mandatory disclosure is required.
An ethics program is not paperwork you buy to pass a clause. It is the nervous system that lets your company feel a problem early and fix it on your terms. Build it to actually work, and it will be the first thing that saves you when you need saving. Brick by brick.
FAQ
Is an ethics program actually required?
Yes. Above certain thresholds the FAR requires a written code of business ethics and conduct, employee access to it, and for larger contracts ongoing training and an internal control system. It is a contract clause.
What should the internal control system do?
It should be reasonably designed to prevent and detect improper conduct, with senior oversight, periodic risk assessment, a safe way for employees to report, and timely discipline and correction.
How does it connect to mandatory disclosure?
Detection feeds disclosure. If your program finds credible evidence of certain violations, you may be required to disclose it, so a program that cannot detect cannot meet that duty.
Why does a real program protect me?
Enforcers weigh whether controls were genuine or cosmetic. A credible program can reduce consequences and keep a single bad act from becoming a company-wide and personal problem.
Sources
Federal Acquisition Regulation. (2026). Subpart 3.10, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct, and clause 52.203-13.
U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. (2026). Effective compliance and ethics program criteria.
This article is general information, not legal advice.
About the Author
Melanie Patterson
Founder and CEO of Team Integrity Knowledge Center and creator of GovCon iSource. Former nurse turned entrepreneur with over 10 years guiding small, women-owned, and minority-owned businesses to over $10 million in government awards. Build, grow, scale, brick by brick. Contact
Your next step
Talk it through with a TIKC advisor
Continue reading
Related stories

Do Your Share of the Work: The Limitations on Subcontracting Rule
When you win a small-business set-aside, the government expects your small business to actually do the work, not hand most of it to a big…

The Wage Rules for Service Work: The Service Contract Act Explained
If you hold a federal service contract, with janitors, guards, call-center staff, or maintenance crews, the Service Contract Act sets what you must pay them…

Paying the Prevailing Wage: The Davis-Bacon and Certified Payroll Trap
On federal construction, you do not get to decide what to pay your workers. The Davis-Bacon Act sets a prevailing wage, and every week you…

When the Auditor Walks the Floor: Surviving a DCAA Floor Check
One day, with no warning, a government auditor shows up and asks your people what they are working on and what contract they are charging…

Timecard Fraud Just Drove a $184 Million Settlement. Your Hours Are the New Target
In 2026, the fastest road to a giant False Claims Act bill is not a fake product or a phantom vendor. It is the timesheet…

The $400 Hammer Problem: Spare-Parts and Catalog Overpricing
The government buys a lot of spare parts, and overcharging for them is one of the oldest and most watched forms of contract abuse. Marking…

Loading the Front End: Why Unbalanced Bidding Can Backfire
You can win a job and still get your pricing wrong in a way that raises red flags. Front-loading early line items, or shifting price…

Pass the First One for Real: First Article Testing and the Approval Trap
On many contracts, before you can ship in volume, one sample has to pass first article testing. Certifying that the first article passed, or sending…

Follow Your Own Rules: Cost Accounting Compliance and Why Consistency Is the Law
Once you tell the government how you account for costs, you have to actually do it that way, every time, on every contract. Quietly shifting…

Warn Before the Money Runs Out: The Limitation of Cost and Funds Clauses
On a cost-type contract, you do not just keep working and billing when the budget is running low. You have a duty to warn the…

Asking for More, Honestly: Why a Padded Request for Equitable Adjustment Is Fraud
When the government changes the job, you have a right to ask for more money through a request for equitable adjustment. That is fair and…

In 2026, GovCon Enforcement Got Personal
Across 2026, one pattern keeps showing up in government contracting settlements: the government is naming the people, not just the companies. CEOs and presidents are…




