From the TIKC Advisory Team · Federal Contracting News
The July 29 Deadline Has Passed: Agencies Had to Review Their 10 Largest Non-Fixed-Price Contracts — What Comes Next
The EO 14402 deadline for agencies to review their 10 largest non-fixed-price contracts hit July 29. What the review means for contractors now.

Published 2026 | TIKC NewsWire
The checkpoint has passed. As of July 29, 2026, the 90-day deadline under Executive Order 14402 came due — the date by which every agency head had to review, and “to the maximum extent practicable” seek to modify, restructure, or renegotiate, the agency’s 10 largest non-fixed-price contracts toward fixed-price with performance-based incentives. July 29 was also the deadline for the first semi-annual report to OMB on non-fixed-price approvals.
What the Order Actually Does
It makes firm-fixed-price (FFP) the default, preferred contract type governmentwide. Any non-fixed-price contract now requires a written justification. Above set thresholds, the agency head must personally approve it, and that approval can only be delegated to non-career (political) appointees. Thresholds run from over $10M for most agencies up to over $100M for the Department of Defense. R&D/major-systems and emergency/contingency contracts are exempt.
Why It Matters If You Hold or Chase Cost-Reimbursement Work
- Conversion pressure is now live. With the review deadline behind them, agencies have compiled their target lists — expect contracting officers to open modification and renegotiation conversations on large cost-type vehicles in the coming weeks.
- The risk shifts to you. FFP places maximum cost risk on the contractor. Without an Economic Price Adjustment (EPA) clause, inflation and labor escalation come straight out of your margin. If you’re bidding or being asked to convert to multi-year FFP work, affirmatively request an EPA clause.
- 8(a) sole-source authority is untouched — but pricing strategy isn’t. Nothing in the EO changes 8(a) sole-source or set-aside authority. It does mean proposals will increasingly be structured FFP, so your JV agreements should spell out who carries overrun risk.
Contractors who build FFP pricing discipline into how they run federal work — not just how they bid it — are the ones who stay profitable. Brick by brick.
FAQ
Now that the deadline has passed, will my contract be converted automatically?
No. July 29 was when agencies had to complete the review and begin seeking conversion. Expect contracting officers to open modification or renegotiation discussions over the coming weeks.
I’m a subcontractor on an FFP prime — am I automatically FFP?
No. Subcontracts on an FFP prime aren’t automatically fixed-price, though primes commonly try to flow FFP terms down. Negotiate the structure that fits your scope.
Sources
Slottee, C. (2026, May 6). Fixed-price first: The new federal contracting mandate. Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt.
PilieroMazza. (2026, July 9). Weekly update for government contractors and commercial businesses.
About the Author
Melanie Patterson
Founder & CEO of Team Integrity Knowledge Center and creator of GovCon iSource. Former nurse turned entrepreneur with over 10 years guiding small, women-owned, and minority-owned businesses to over $10 million in government awards. Build, grow, scale — brick by brick. Contact
Your next step
Talk it through with a TIKC advisor
Continue reading
Related stories

One Faked Test Cost a Navy Supplier $10.9 Million
A company that makes steel for Navy ships let a tester change results so weak steel looked like it passed. It is paying about $10.9…

When Competitors Become Co-Conspirators: Bid Rigging and Collusion
A quiet word with a competitor about who wins which job feels like cooperation. It is a federal antitrust crime. Bid rigging and collusion carry…

The Set-Aside That Was Performed by the Wrong Company. A $4.8 Million Lesson.
A federal IT contractor and its owner agreed to pay $4.8 million after allegedly paying fees to 8(a) firms to win set-aside work, then doing…

The Cover-Up That Is Worse Than the Problem: Obstruction and Altering Records
When an audit or investigation looms, the instinct to clean up a file is a catastrophic one. Deleting an email or backdating a document can…

The Official Who Approved His Own Payday. A Conflict-of-Interest Indictment.
A government contracting official was charged after allegedly approving invoices that funneled money back to a side business he profited from, aided by a contractor…

The Case You Never See Coming: The FCA Seal, First-to-File, and the Disclosure Bar
A whistleblower suit can sit under court seal for years while the government investigates you in secret. Understanding the seal, the first-to-file rule, and the…

Winning on a Promise You Cannot Keep: Fraud in the Inducement
Overstate your staff, your experience, or your capabilities to win the award, and you can poison the entire contract. Fraud in the inducement means the…

The Loyalty You Owe: Honest Services Fraud and the Hidden Conflict
You can commit a federal crime without stealing a dollar. Honest services fraud punishes the person who secretly sells out the loyalty they owe, through…

$377 Million for the Costs It Should Not Have Billed. A Mischarging Lesson.
A major contractor agreed to pay $377 million, one of the largest procurement fraud settlements ever, over how it billed indirect costs to the government…
The Chip That Was Not Real: Counterfeit Electronic Parts and Your Duty to Catch Them
A single counterfeit microchip in a defense system can cost lives and end a company. For many contractors, the law does not just punish knowingly…

Signing for Your Code: The Secure Software Development Self-Attestation
If you sell software to the government, a senior executive now has to personally attest that it was built following secure development practices. That signature…

The NDA Clause That Can Void Your Contract: The Anti-Gag Rule
That confidentiality agreement your employees sign may quietly break federal law. The anti-gag rule bars contractors from using NDAs that stop employees from reporting fraud…




