From the TIKC Advisory Team · Federal Contracting News
The FAR Overhaul Enters Phase 2: The Comment Window Just Closed — Here’s What’s Changing and What’s Next for Small Business
The FAR Council’s Phase 2 proposed rules would permanently rewrite about 20 FAR parts. Comments on the first batch closed July 23. What to watch…

Published 2026 | TIKC NewsWire
On June 23, 2026, the FAR Council published the first four proposed rules of Phase 2 of the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) — permanent rewrites of roughly 20 FAR parts, implementing Executive Order 14275. The public comment window on that first batch closed July 23, 2026. Phase 1 used temporary class deviations to test streamlined FAR text; Phase 2 is the formal notice-and-comment rulemaking that makes those changes permanent.
What Phase 2 Actually Does
It converts much of the Phase 1 deviation framework into permanent regulation — but in several places the proposals refine, consolidate, and materially change the earlier deviation language. The first package covers four FAR cases and about 20 parts plus related FAR Part 52 clauses.
Two Changes Worth Your Attention
- A five-year regulatory sunset (new FAR 1.109). For the first time, the FAR builds in a sunset: non-statutory provisions and clauses can be set to expire, and the Council will periodically ask the public which non-statutory rules should lapse. The rulebook gets lighter over time — but you’ll need to track which clauses actually survive.
- A SAM / entity-registration overhaul (FAR Part 4). The Council proposes to restructure how entity information is collected from offerors and maintained in SAM — for most contractors, the most consequential administrative change in the batch, and a favorable one.
What’s Coming for Small Business
The Council plans additional batches covering Parts 8, 12, 13, 15, 16, and 19. Part 19 governs the small business programs, so the set-aside framework itself is on the table in an upcoming round. Watch the new sunset mechanism too — commentators note FAR 1.109 could eventually expose the “Rule of Two” to review.
What to Do Now
Read the proposed text for the parts you live in. If Part 19 matters to your business, be ready to comment the moment that batch drops. And update your internal compliance checklists against the permanent language, not the temporary deviations — because once a final rule takes effect, that text is binding governmentwide. Brick by brick.
FAQ
Are these rules final?
No — they’re proposed. But the compressed comment period signals the Council intends to move quickly, and final rules are widely expected in 2026.
Did I miss my chance to comment?
For the first four rules, the window closed July 23. More batches are coming, each with its own comment period — including the one expected to touch Part 19.
Sources
Wiley Rein LLP. (2026, June 23). FAR Council begins rulemaking to implement FAR overhaul, proposing revisions to 20 FAR parts.
Sheppard Mullin. (2026, June 25). Revolutionary FAR Overhaul update: Rulemaking phase begins.
About the Author
Melanie Patterson
Founder & CEO of Team Integrity Knowledge Center and creator of GovCon iSource. Former nurse turned entrepreneur with over 10 years guiding small, women-owned, and minority-owned businesses to over $10 million in government awards. Build, grow, scale — brick by brick. Contact
Your next step
Talk it through with a TIKC advisor
Continue reading
Related stories

One Faked Test Cost a Navy Supplier $10.9 Million
A company that makes steel for Navy ships let a tester change results so weak steel looked like it passed. It is paying about $10.9…

When Competitors Become Co-Conspirators: Bid Rigging and Collusion
A quiet word with a competitor about who wins which job feels like cooperation. It is a federal antitrust crime. Bid rigging and collusion carry…

The Set-Aside That Was Performed by the Wrong Company. A $4.8 Million Lesson.
A federal IT contractor and its owner agreed to pay $4.8 million after allegedly paying fees to 8(a) firms to win set-aside work, then doing…

The Cover-Up That Is Worse Than the Problem: Obstruction and Altering Records
When an audit or investigation looms, the instinct to clean up a file is a catastrophic one. Deleting an email or backdating a document can…

The Official Who Approved His Own Payday. A Conflict-of-Interest Indictment.
A government contracting official was charged after allegedly approving invoices that funneled money back to a side business he profited from, aided by a contractor…

The Case You Never See Coming: The FCA Seal, First-to-File, and the Disclosure Bar
A whistleblower suit can sit under court seal for years while the government investigates you in secret. Understanding the seal, the first-to-file rule, and the…

Winning on a Promise You Cannot Keep: Fraud in the Inducement
Overstate your staff, your experience, or your capabilities to win the award, and you can poison the entire contract. Fraud in the inducement means the…

The Loyalty You Owe: Honest Services Fraud and the Hidden Conflict
You can commit a federal crime without stealing a dollar. Honest services fraud punishes the person who secretly sells out the loyalty they owe, through…

$377 Million for the Costs It Should Not Have Billed. A Mischarging Lesson.
A major contractor agreed to pay $377 million, one of the largest procurement fraud settlements ever, over how it billed indirect costs to the government…
The Chip That Was Not Real: Counterfeit Electronic Parts and Your Duty to Catch Them
A single counterfeit microchip in a defense system can cost lives and end a company. For many contractors, the law does not just punish knowingly…

Signing for Your Code: The Secure Software Development Self-Attestation
If you sell software to the government, a senior executive now has to personally attest that it was built following secure development practices. That signature…

The NDA Clause That Can Void Your Contract: The Anti-Gag Rule
That confidentiality agreement your employees sign may quietly break federal law. The anti-gag rule bars contractors from using NDAs that stop employees from reporting fraud…




