From the TIKC Advisory Team · Federal Contracting News
When Asking for Money You Are Owed Becomes Fraud: The Contract Disputes Act Trap
Filing a claim or request for equitable adjustment is your right when the government owes you. But inflate it or certify it falsely, and the…

Published 2026 | TIKC NewsWire
When the government changes the work, delays you, or fails to hold up its end, you have a right to be made whole. The Contract Disputes Act gives you a structured way to ask, through a request for equitable adjustment or a formal claim. But here is the trap that catches contractors who feel wronged and let frustration drive the numbers: the very document you use to recover money you are legitimately owed can become the evidence of fraud if you inflate it or certify it falsely. Asking is your right. Exaggerating is a crime.
Claims and REAs, briefly
Two instruments do most of the work. A request for equitable adjustment (REA) is a request to adjust the contract price or schedule, often to resolve a change or disruption without a formal dispute. A claim under the Contract Disputes Act is a more formal written demand for a sum certain or other relief, submitted to the contracting officer for a decision, and it opens the door to appeal at a board of contract appeals or the Court of Federal Claims. Both are legitimate, everyday tools. The difference that matters here is the certification.
The claim certification is a sworn statement
For claims above a dollar threshold, the Contract Disputes Act requires a certification: that the claim is made in good faith, that the supporting data are accurate and complete to the best of your knowledge, and that the amount requested accurately reflects what you believe the government owes. That certification is not a formality. It is a representation you are legally accountable for. Padding the numbers, including costs you know are not recoverable, or building a claim on figures you have not verified turns that certification into a false statement.
The fraud statutes waiting behind a bad claim
A fraudulent claim does not just fail. It can trigger a stack of penalties. The False Claims Act can apply, with treble damages. The Contract Disputes Act has its own anti-fraud provision that makes a contractor liable for an unsupported part of a claim attributable to misrepresentation or fraud, plus the government’s costs. And the forfeiture statute for fraudulent claims against the United States can cause a contractor to forfeit the entire claim, not just the inflated portion. In other words, one padded number can poison an otherwise valid claim and cost you far more than you tried to gain.
How to pursue what you are owed safely
The goal is not to discourage legitimate claims. You should absolutely recover what the government genuinely owes you. The discipline is to build the claim on real, documented costs, to include only what is recoverable under the contract and cost principles, and to certify only what you can support. Keep the contemporaneous records, the change documentation, the cost data, and the schedule analysis that prove your entitlement. A well-supported claim is both more likely to succeed and immune to the fraud trap.
What to do now
- Base every claim on documented costs. Build from real records, not estimates shaped by frustration.
- Include only recoverable costs. Screen out anything unallowable or outside the contract before you certify.
- Take the certification seriously. It is a sworn representation, so certify only what you can support.
- Keep contemporaneous records. Change orders, cost data, and schedule analyses are your proof of entitlement.
- Get review before submission. A second set of eyes on a large claim can catch a number that would become a liability.
Pursuing what you are owed is good business, and doing it honestly is what keeps it good business. Build the claim on the truth, and it protects you as much as it pays you. Brick by brick.
FAQ
What is the difference between an REA and a claim?
An REA is a request to adjust the contract price or schedule, often resolved informally. A claim under the Contract Disputes Act is a formal written demand submitted to the contracting officer for a decision, which can be appealed.
What does the claim certification require?
For claims above a threshold, you certify the claim is made in good faith, the supporting data are accurate and complete to the best of your knowledge, and the amount reflects what you believe the government owes.
What happens if I inflate a claim?
You can face False Claims Act treble damages, the Contract Disputes Act anti-fraud provision, and the forfeiture statute, which can cause you to lose the entire claim, not just the inflated part.
How do I pursue a claim safely?
Build it on real, documented costs, include only recoverable amounts, certify only what you can support, and keep contemporaneous records proving entitlement.
Sources
U.S. Congress. (2026). Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. 7101-7109, including the fraud provision.
U.S. Congress. (2026). Forfeiture of fraudulent claims against the United States, 28 U.S.C. 2514.
This article is general information, not legal advice.
About the Author
Melanie Patterson
Founder and CEO of Team Integrity Knowledge Center and creator of GovCon iSource. Former nurse turned entrepreneur with over 10 years guiding small, women-owned, and minority-owned businesses to over $10 million in government awards. Build, grow, scale, brick by brick. Contact
Your next step
Talk it through with a TIKC advisor
Continue reading
Related stories

One Faked Test Cost a Navy Supplier $10.9 Million
A company that makes steel for Navy ships let a tester change results so weak steel looked like it passed. It is paying about $10.9…

When Competitors Become Co-Conspirators: Bid Rigging and Collusion
A quiet word with a competitor about who wins which job feels like cooperation. It is a federal antitrust crime. Bid rigging and collusion carry…

The Set-Aside That Was Performed by the Wrong Company. A $4.8 Million Lesson.
A federal IT contractor and its owner agreed to pay $4.8 million after allegedly paying fees to 8(a) firms to win set-aside work, then doing…

The Cover-Up That Is Worse Than the Problem: Obstruction and Altering Records
When an audit or investigation looms, the instinct to clean up a file is a catastrophic one. Deleting an email or backdating a document can…

The Official Who Approved His Own Payday. A Conflict-of-Interest Indictment.
A government contracting official was charged after allegedly approving invoices that funneled money back to a side business he profited from, aided by a contractor…

The Case You Never See Coming: The FCA Seal, First-to-File, and the Disclosure Bar
A whistleblower suit can sit under court seal for years while the government investigates you in secret. Understanding the seal, the first-to-file rule, and the…

Winning on a Promise You Cannot Keep: Fraud in the Inducement
Overstate your staff, your experience, or your capabilities to win the award, and you can poison the entire contract. Fraud in the inducement means the…

The Loyalty You Owe: Honest Services Fraud and the Hidden Conflict
You can commit a federal crime without stealing a dollar. Honest services fraud punishes the person who secretly sells out the loyalty they owe, through…

$377 Million for the Costs It Should Not Have Billed. A Mischarging Lesson.
A major contractor agreed to pay $377 million, one of the largest procurement fraud settlements ever, over how it billed indirect costs to the government…
The Chip That Was Not Real: Counterfeit Electronic Parts and Your Duty to Catch Them
A single counterfeit microchip in a defense system can cost lives and end a company. For many contractors, the law does not just punish knowingly…

Signing for Your Code: The Secure Software Development Self-Attestation
If you sell software to the government, a senior executive now has to personally attest that it was built following secure development practices. That signature…

The NDA Clause That Can Void Your Contract: The Anti-Gag Rule
That confidentiality agreement your employees sign may quietly break federal law. The anti-gag rule bars contractors from using NDAs that stop employees from reporting fraud…




